Chengdu Rongcheng v Tianjin Jinmen Tiger — Prediction, Odds & Stats
Saturday 10 October 2026 · CHN-Super League · 2627
CHN-Super League
results-only Prediction generated
AI prediction
ai-blend v1.0 dailyCalibrated: the model's number corrected by how often calls at that confidence have landed, out of sample (2,277 settled matches in the thinnest band), then normalised. The smaller figure is the raw model output.
Top 5 scorelines
- 1-1 11.1%
- 2-1 9.9%
- 1-0 9.6%
- 2-0 9.2%
- 3-1 6.1%
Goals
| Over 2.5 | 55.8% | Under 2.5 | 44.2% |
| BTTS yes | 55.8% | BTTS no | 44.2% |
| Chengdu Rongcheng 1+ | 84.2% | Chengdu Rongcheng 2+ | 55.0% |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger 1+ | 65.8% | Tianjin Jinmen Tiger 2+ | 29.1% |
Expected goals 1.84 – 1.07. Every market above is read off one scoreline distribution.
Footing
Positive factors
- Chengdu Rongcheng carry the stronger rating, 1653 Elo against 1516.
Risk factors
- Data quality is 55/100, so this price rests on less than the model would like.
- The model's measured edge in this competition is -0.0120 nats, which is not meaningfully better than the base rates.
Why the model thinks this
The price
Chengdu Rongcheng have an estimated 56.0% win probability, against 22.0% for the draw and 22.0% for Tianjin Jinmen Tiger. Expected goals from the ensemble are 1.84 for Chengdu Rongcheng and 1.07 for Tianjin Jinmen Tiger.
Why Chengdu Rongcheng
Chengdu Rongcheng carry the stronger rating, 1653 Elo against 1516.
Why the draw is live
The draw sits at 22.0%. Draws run at 26% in this competition.
Why Tianjin Jinmen Tiger can win
Nothing in the data singles out Tianjin Jinmen Tiger.
Key players
No player-level data for this fixture; the leagues with lineups are the big five.
Availability
No lineup on record for Chengdu Rongcheng, so availability is unknown. No lineup on record for Tianjin Jinmen Tiger, so availability is unknown.
The matchup, as far as the data reaches
Chengdu Rongcheng: 53% possession, 17.4 shots a match, 13.8 faced, 0.30 xG a match from set pieces. Tianjin Jinmen Tiger: 46% possession, 14.8 shots a match, 14.0 faced, 0.30 xG a match from set pieces.
Inputs last refreshed: matches 2026-09-05 22:20 · team_stats 2026-09-05 09:41 · availability 2026-09-05 21:03 · prediction 2026-09-05 18:39 ·
Chengdu Rongcheng are the model's most likely outcome at 56.0%. The likeliest scoreline is 1-1 at 11.1%. Confidence 22/100, data quality 55/100. These are probabilities, not certainties: the less likely outcome happens as often as its number says.
Written from the numbers the model saw, not by a language model; nothing here is a statistic the snapshot does not hold. How predictions work.
Was this pick made in advance?
-oos is out of sample: it was fitted only on matches
played before this one, so its pick is a genuine forecast rather than hindsight.
Anything without that suffix was fitted on all available data.What the model said
| Model | Home / Draw / Away | Expected goals | Likeliest score | O2.5 | BTTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dc-xg | 1.74–0.96 | 1-1 12% | 51% | 51% |
A model whose name ends -oos was produced by the walk-forward backtest:
it was fitted only on matches played before this one, so the pick is genuinely out of sample.
Using this section
All markets
Every selection below comes from the same scoreline distribution, so they are mutually consistent rather than independently guessed. Calibrated is the model corrected by its own out-of-sample record; lift is how much more likely that is than the selection simply being true in this league anyway.
1X2 3
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chengdu Rongcheng to win | 55.3% | 54.0% | 46.0% | 1.17× | 1.85 |
| Draw | 24.4% | 24.5% | 26.2% | 0.93× | 4.09 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger to win | 20.3% | 24.4% | 28.0% | 0.87× | 4.09 |
1X2 & GG/NG 6
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chengdu Rongcheng & not both score | 31.1% | 29.7% | 23.2% | 1.28× | 3.37 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng & both teams score | 24.2% | 21.9% | 23.0% | 0.95× | 4.57 |
| Draw & both teams score | 17.3% | 17.9% | 22.1% | 0.81× | 5.58 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger & not both score | 10.4% | 13.3% | 9.8% | 1.35× | 7.55 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger & both teams score | 9.9% | 8.4% | 18.5% | 0.45× | 11.92 |
| Draw & not both score | 7.1% | 8.4% | 4.3% | 1.94× | 11.93 |
1X2 & Over/Under 18
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chengdu Rongcheng & over 1.5 | 44.0% | 40.3% | 36.4% | 1.11× | 2.48 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng & under 3.5 | 37.1% | 34.9% | 27.3% | 1.28× | 2.86 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng & over 2.5 | 33.8% | 30.9% | 29.4% | 1.05× | 3.24 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng & under 2.5 | 21.4% | 21.6% | 16.9% | 1.28× | 4.62 |
| Draw & under 2.5 | 18.7% | 18.0% | 16.4% | 1.10× | 5.56 |
| Draw & under 3.5 | 18.7% | 18.0% | 16.4% | 1.10× | 5.56 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng & over 3.5 | 18.2% | 18.0% | 18.9% | 0.95× | 5.56 |
| Draw & over 1.5 | 17.3% | 18.0% | 22.1% | 0.81× | 5.56 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger & under 3.5 | 15.5% | 18.0% | 15.9% | 1.13× | 5.56 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger & over 1.5 | 14.3% | 12.9% | 23.7% | 0.54× | 7.77 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng & under 1.5 | 11.3% | 12.9% | 9.8% | 1.31× | 7.77 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger & over 2.5 | 11.2% | 12.9% | 21.0% | 0.61× | 7.77 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger & under 2.5 | 9.2% | 7.9% | 7.3% | 1.08× | 12.70 |
| Draw & under 1.5 | 7.1% | 7.9% | 4.3% | 1.82× | 12.70 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger & under 1.5 | 6.0% | 7.9% | 4.6% | 1.73× | 12.70 |
| Draw & over 2.5 | 5.7% | 7.9% | 10.0% | 0.79× | 12.70 |
| Draw & over 3.5 | 5.7% | 7.9% | 10.0% | 0.79× | 12.70 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger & over 3.5 | 4.8% | 4.8% | 12.3% | 0.39× | 20.92 |
1X2 1UP 2
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chengdu Rongcheng (1UP) | 68.4% | 70.0% | — | — | 1.43 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger (1UP) | 37.7% | 34.1% | — | — | 2.94 |
1X2 2UP 2
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chengdu Rongcheng (2UP) | 55.3% | 54.9% | — | — | 1.82 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger (2UP) | 20.3% | 23.3% | — | — | 4.30 |
2nd half 1X2 3
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chengdu Rongcheng to win 2nd half | 44.4% | 41.3% | — | — | 2.42 |
| 2nd half drawn | 34.8% | 34.3% | — | — | 2.91 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger to win 2nd half | 20.7% | 22.9% | — | — | 4.37 |
Asian handicap 8
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger (+2.5) | 86.1% | 88.5% | 89.3% | 0.99× | 1.13 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng (+0.5) | 79.7% | 78.5% | 72.0% | 1.09× | 1.27 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger (+1.5) | 68.9% | 68.7% | 74.7% | 0.92× | 1.46 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng (-0.5) | 55.3% | 57.0% | 46.0% | 1.24× | 1.76 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger (+0.5) | 44.7% | 43.0% | 54.0% | 0.80× | 2.33 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng (-1.5) | 31.1% | 31.3% | 25.3% | 1.24× | 3.20 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger (-0.5) | 20.3% | 21.5% | 28.0% | 0.77× | 4.65 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng (-2.5) | 13.9% | 11.5% | 10.7% | 1.08× | 8.68 |
Away clean sheet 2
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger to concede | 82.4% | 81.3% | 86.1% | 0.94× | 1.23 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger clean sheet | 17.6% | 18.7% | 13.9% | 1.34× | 5.36 |
Away clean sheet 1HT 2
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger clean sheet in 1st half | 47.3% | 50.5% | — | — | 1.98 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger to concede in 1st half | 52.7% | 49.5% | — | — | 2.02 |
Away corners O/U 10
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger under 6.5 corners | 94.1% | 90.1% | — | — | 1.11 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger under 5.5 corners | 88.2% | 85.2% | — | — | 1.17 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger under 4.5 corners | 78.0% | 75.9% | — | — | 1.32 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger under 3.5 corners | 62.7% | 61.8% | — | — | 1.62 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger over 2.5 corners | 57.2% | 57.1% | — | — | 1.75 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger under 2.5 corners | 42.8% | 42.9% | — | — | 2.33 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger over 3.5 corners | 37.3% | 38.2% | — | — | 2.62 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger over 4.5 corners | 22.0% | 24.1% | — | — | 4.16 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger over 5.5 corners | 11.8% | 14.8% | — | — | 6.75 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger over 6.5 corners | 5.9% | 9.9% | — | — | 10.09 |
Away goals O/U 8
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger under 3.5 goals | 98.3% | 97.6% | 92.9% | 1.05× | 1.03 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger under 2.5 goals | 92.7% | 92.3% | 83.1% | 1.11× | 1.08 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger under 1.5 goals | 75.0% | 72.0% | 60.8% | 1.18× | 1.39 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger over 0.5 goals | 61.8% | 62.9% | 72.7% | 0.87× | 1.59 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger under 0.5 goals | 38.2% | 37.1% | 27.3% | 1.36× | 2.70 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger over 1.5 goals | 25.0% | 28.0% | 39.2% | 0.72× | 3.57 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger over 2.5 goals | 7.3% | 7.7% | 16.9% | 0.45× | 13.07 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger over 3.5 goals | 1.7% | 2.4% | 7.1% | 0.35× | 40.89 |
Away goals O/U 1HT 4
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger under 1.5 in 1st half | 94.2% | 94.2% | — | — | 1.06 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger under 0.5 in 1st half | 68.1% | 68.3% | — | — | 1.46 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger over 0.5 in 1st half | 31.9% | 31.7% | — | — | 3.16 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger over 1.5 in 1st half | 5.8% | 5.8% | — | — | 17.23 |
Away no bet 2
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chengdu Rongcheng (away no bet) | 69.4% | 66.5% | 63.7% | 1.04× | 1.50 |
| Draw (away no bet) | 30.6% | 33.5% | 36.3% | 0.92× | 2.98 |
Away Odd/Even 2
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger even goals | 57.3% | 56.9% | 54.7% | 1.04× | 1.76 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger odd goals | 42.7% | 43.1% | 45.3% | 0.95× | 2.32 |
Both halves O1.5 2
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not both halves over 1.5 | 85.4% | 87.8% | — | — | 1.14 |
| Both halves over 1.5 goals | 14.6% | 12.2% | — | — | 8.17 |
Both halves U1.5 2
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not both halves under 1.5 | 63.5% | 58.0% | — | — | 1.72 |
| Both halves under 1.5 goals | 36.5% | 42.0% | — | — | 2.38 |
Consecutive goals 6
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Either team to score 2+ in a row | 56.8% | 55.2% | — | — | 1.81 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng to score 2+ in a row | 44.5% | 38.4% | — | — | 2.60 |
| Either team to score 3+ in a row | 21.8% | 19.5% | — | — | 5.13 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng to score 3+ in a row | 18.3% | 16.4% | — | — | 6.09 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger to score 2+ in a row | 17.5% | 16.4% | — | — | 6.09 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger to score 3+ in a row | 3.8% | 2.6% | — | — | 38.11 |
Corner handicap 12
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chengdu Rongcheng corners (+3.5) | 98.3% | 95.8% | — | — | 1.04 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng corners (+2.5) | 96.7% | 95.8% | — | — | 1.04 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng corners (+1.5) | 94.0% | 89.6% | — | — | 1.12 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng corners (-1.5) | 76.1% | 74.9% | — | — | 1.34 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng corners (-2.5) | 66.8% | 65.8% | — | — | 1.52 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng corners (-3.5) | 56.7% | 57.1% | — | — | 1.75 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger corners (+3.5) | 43.3% | 42.9% | — | — | 2.33 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger corners (+2.5) | 33.2% | 34.2% | — | — | 2.92 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger corners (+1.5) | 23.9% | 25.1% | — | — | 3.98 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger corners (-1.5) | 6.0% | 10.4% | — | — | 9.59 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger corners (-2.5) | 3.3% | 4.2% | — | — | 23.56 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger corners (-3.5) | 1.7% | 4.2% | — | — | 23.61 |
Corner range 3
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12+ corners | 37.9% | 33.7% | — | — | 2.97 |
| 0-8 corners | 32.4% | 33.2% | — | — | 3.01 |
| 9-11 corners | 29.7% | 31.2% | — | — | 3.20 |
Corners O/U 12
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Over 7.5 corners | 76.9% | 76.5% | — | — | 1.31 |
| Under 12.5 corners | 70.6% | 72.7% | — | — | 1.38 |
| Over 8.5 corners | 67.6% | 67.7% | — | — | 1.48 |
| Under 11.5 corners | 62.1% | 63.4% | — | — | 1.58 |
| Over 9.5 corners | 57.5% | 57.7% | — | — | 1.73 |
| Under 10.5 corners | 52.6% | 53.3% | — | — | 1.88 |
| Over 10.5 corners | 47.4% | 46.7% | — | — | 2.14 |
| Under 9.5 corners | 42.5% | 42.3% | — | — | 2.37 |
| Over 11.5 corners | 37.9% | 36.6% | — | — | 2.73 |
| Under 8.5 corners | 32.4% | 32.3% | — | — | 3.09 |
| Over 12.5 corners | 29.4% | 27.3% | — | — | 3.66 |
| Under 7.5 corners | 23.1% | 23.5% | — | — | 4.26 |
Corners Odd/Even 2
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Odd number of corners | 50.0% | 50.2% | — | — | 1.99 |
| Even number of corners | 50.0% | 49.9% | — | — | 2.01 |
Correct score 26
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-0 | 11.3% | 11.4% | 9.8% | 1.17× | 8.74 |
| 1-1 | 11.6% | 11.4% | 12.3% | 0.93× | 8.74 |
| 2-0 | 10.2% | 11.4% | 7.3% | 1.57× | 8.74 |
| 2-1 | 9.8% | 7.4% | 7.5% | 0.99× | 13.47 |
| 0-0 | 7.1% | 7.4% | 4.3% | 1.72× | 13.47 |
| 0-1 | 6.0% | 7.4% | 4.6% | 1.63× | 13.47 |
| 1-2 | 5.4% | 7.4% | 7.5% | 0.99× | 13.47 |
| 3-0 | 5.9% | 7.4% | 3.4% | 2.17× | 13.47 |
| 3-1 | 5.7% | 7.4% | 6.2% | 1.21× | 13.47 |
| 2-2 | 4.7% | 1.7% | 7.5% | 0.23× | 58.50 |
| 0-2 | 3.1% | 1.7% | 3.0% | 0.58× | 58.51 |
| 0-3 | 1.0% | 1.7% | 1.6% | 1.07× | 58.52 |
| 0-4 | 0.2% | 1.7% | 1.1% | 1.50× | 58.52 |
| 1-3 | 1.7% | 1.7% | 3.2% | 0.54× | 58.51 |
| 1-4 | 0.4% | 1.7% | 1.1% | 1.50× | 58.52 |
| 2-3 | 1.5% | 1.7% | 3.2% | 0.54× | 58.52 |
| 2-4 | 0.4% | 1.7% | 1.4% | 1.25× | 58.52 |
| 3-2 | 2.7% | 1.7% | 3.6% | 0.47× | 58.51 |
| 3-3 | 0.9% | 1.7% | 2.1% | 0.83× | 58.52 |
| 3-4 | 0.2% | 1.7% | 1.6% | 1.07× | 58.52 |
| 4-0 | 2.6% | 1.7% | 2.7% | 0.63× | 58.51 |
| 4-1 | 2.5% | 1.7% | 2.5% | 0.68× | 58.51 |
| 4-2 | 1.2% | 1.7% | 1.6% | 1.07× | 58.52 |
| 4-3 | 0.4% | 1.7% | 0.7% | 2.50× | 58.52 |
| 4-4 | 0.1% | 1.7% | 0.9% | 1.88× | 58.52 |
| Any other score | 3.5% | 1.7% | 4.8% | 0.36× | 58.50 |
DNB half time 2
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chengdu Rongcheng leading at HT (DNB) | 70.2% | 71.2% | — | — | 1.40 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger leading at HT (DNB) | 29.8% | 28.8% | — | — | 3.48 |
Double chance 3
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chengdu Rongcheng or draw (1X) | 79.7% | 75.6% | 72.0% | 1.05× | 1.32 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng or Tianjin Jinmen Tiger (12) | 75.6% | 75.5% | 73.8% | 1.02× | 1.32 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger or draw (X2) | 44.7% | 46.0% | 54.0% | 0.85× | 2.17 |
Double chance 1HT 3
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chengdu Rongcheng or draw at HT | 82.8% | 84.4% | — | — | 1.19 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger or draw at HT | 59.5% | 56.6% | — | — | 1.77 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng or Tianjin Jinmen Tiger at HT | 57.7% | 56.6% | — | — | 1.77 |
Double chance 1UP 2
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chengdu Rongcheng or draw (1UP) | 79.7% | 84.2% | — | — | 1.19 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger or draw (1UP) | 44.7% | 52.9% | — | — | 1.89 |
Double chance 2HT 3
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chengdu Rongcheng or draw in 2nd half | 79.3% | 77.1% | — | — | 1.30 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng or Tianjin Jinmen Tiger in 2nd half | 65.2% | 65.7% | — | — | 1.52 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger or draw in 2nd half | 55.6% | 58.7% | — | — | 1.71 |
Draw either half 2
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A half drawn | 62.0% | 61.7% | — | — | 1.62 |
| Neither half drawn | 38.0% | 38.3% | — | — | 2.61 |
Draw no bet 2
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chengdu Rongcheng (DNB) | 73.1% | 71.5% | 62.2% | 1.15× | 1.40 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger (DNB) | 26.9% | 28.5% | 37.8% | 0.75× | 3.51 |
First goal 3
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chengdu Rongcheng to score first | 59.8% | 62.1% | — | — | 1.61 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger to score first | 33.1% | 27.0% | — | — | 3.71 |
| No goal scored | 7.1% | 7.5% | — | — | 13.36 |
GG/NG 2
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Both teams to score | 51.3% | 51.4% | 63.1% | 0.82× | 1.94 |
| Not both teams to score | 48.7% | 48.6% | 36.9% | 1.32× | 2.06 |
GG/NG & Over/Under 4
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Both score & over 2.5 | 39.7% | 38.5% | 51.0% | 0.76× | 2.60 |
| Not both score & under 2.5 | 37.7% | 38.5% | 28.0% | 1.37× | 2.60 |
| Both score & under 2.5 | 11.6% | 12.3% | 12.3% | 1.00× | 8.12 |
| Not both score & over 2.5 | 11.0% | 12.3% | 9.1% | 1.35× | 8.12 |
GG/NG 2+ 2
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not both teams to score 2+ | 87.0% | 85.7% | 78.4% | 1.09× | 1.17 |
| Both teams to score 2+ | 13.0% | 14.3% | 21.6% | 0.66× | 6.97 |
GG/NG 2nd half 2
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not both to score in 2nd half | 72.3% | 74.2% | — | — | 1.35 |
| Both teams to score in 2nd half | 27.7% | 25.8% | — | — | 3.88 |
GG/NG by half 4
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neither half both score | 60.0% | 66.6% | — | — | 1.50 |
| Both score 2nd half only | 23.1% | 20.9% | — | — | 4.77 |
| Both score 1st half only | 12.3% | 10.5% | — | — | 9.48 |
| Both score in both halves | 4.6% | 5.0% | — | — | 20.13 |
GG/NG half time 2
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not both to score by HT | 83.1% | 82.9% | — | — | 1.21 |
| Both teams to score by HT | 16.9% | 17.2% | — | — | 5.83 |
Goal in both halves 2
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A goal in each half | 53.9% | 53.5% | — | — | 1.87 |
| A half without a goal | 46.1% | 46.5% | — | — | 2.15 |
Goal range 4
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-3 goals | 46.9% | 47.4% | 41.2% | 1.15× | 2.11 |
| 4-6 goals | 26.6% | 26.4% | 36.9% | 0.72× | 3.78 |
| 0-1 goals | 24.4% | 22.8% | 18.2% | 1.25× | 4.38 |
| 7+ goals | 2.1% | 1.8% | 4.1% | 0.44× | 55.04 |
Goals away 4
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger to score exactly 0 | 38.2% | 36.0% | 27.3% | 1.32× | 2.78 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger to score exactly 1 | 36.8% | 36.0% | 33.7% | 1.07× | 2.78 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger to score exactly 2 | 17.7% | 19.5% | 22.6% | 0.87× | 5.12 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger to score 3+ | 7.3% | 8.5% | 16.9% | 0.50× | 11.81 |
Goals home 4
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chengdu Rongcheng to score exactly 1 | 30.5% | 32.6% | 34.2% | 0.96× | 3.06 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng to score exactly 2 | 26.6% | 26.5% | 26.2% | 1.01× | 3.77 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng to score 3+ | 25.3% | 26.5% | 26.2% | 1.01× | 3.77 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng to score exactly 0 | 17.6% | 18.9% | 13.9% | 1.36× | 5.30 |
Half time 3
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Draw at HT | 42.3% | 43.4% | — | — | 2.30 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng leading at HT | 40.5% | 43.4% | — | — | 2.31 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger leading at HT | 17.2% | 15.6% | — | — | 6.40 |
Handicap 3
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chengdu Rongcheng -1: 2 | 44.7% | 42.8% | — | — | 2.34 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng -1: 1 | 31.1% | 30.0% | — | — | 3.33 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng -1: X | 24.2% | 23.6% | — | — | 4.24 |
Handicap 0:1 3
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger (0:1) | 44.7% | 42.7% | 54.0% | 0.79× | 2.34 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng (0:1) | 31.1% | 30.0% | 25.3% | 1.19× | 3.33 |
| Draw (0:1) | 24.2% | 24.3% | 21.0% | 1.16× | 4.12 |
Handicap 0:2 3
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger (0:2) | 68.9% | 72.2% | 74.7% | 0.97× | 1.39 |
| Draw (0:2) | 17.1% | 15.3% | 14.8% | 1.03× | 6.54 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng (0:2) | 13.9% | 11.0% | 10.7% | 1.03× | 9.10 |
Handicap 0:3 3
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger (0:3) | 86.1% | 90.7% | 89.3% | 1.02× | 1.10 |
| Draw (0:3) | 8.8% | 5.8% | 5.9% | 0.98× | 17.16 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng (0:3) | 5.1% | 5.8% | 5.0% | 1.16× | 17.22 |
Handicap 0:4 3
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger (0:4) | 94.9% | 94.7% | 95.0% | 1.00× | 1.06 |
| Draw (0:4) | 3.5% | 1.2% | 3.9% | 0.31× | 83.19 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng (0:4) | 1.6% | 1.2% | 1.4% | 0.88× | 83.43 |
Handicap 1:0 3
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chengdu Rongcheng (1:0) | 79.7% | 78.5% | 72.0% | 1.09× | 1.27 |
| Draw (1:0) | 13.2% | 12.8% | 16.4% | 0.78× | 7.80 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger (1:0) | 7.1% | 6.9% | 11.8% | 0.58× | 14.47 |
Handicap 2:0 3
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chengdu Rongcheng (2:0) | 92.9% | 94.0% | 88.2% | 1.07× | 1.06 |
| Draw (2:0) | 5.2% | 6.4% | 7.1% | 0.91× | 15.55 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger (2:0) | 1.9% | 2.3% | 5.0% | 0.45× | 44.39 |
Highest scoring half 3
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2nd half highest scoring | 47.1% | 48.1% | — | — | 2.08 |
| 1st half highest scoring | 27.2% | 26.5% | — | — | 3.77 |
| Halves equal | 25.7% | 26.5% | — | — | 3.78 |
Home clean sheet 2
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chengdu Rongcheng to concede | 61.8% | 63.4% | 72.7% | 0.87× | 1.58 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng clean sheet | 38.2% | 36.6% | 27.3% | 1.34× | 2.73 |
Home clean sheet 1HT 2
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chengdu Rongcheng clean sheet in 1st half | 68.1% | 68.6% | — | — | 1.46 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng to concede in 1st half | 31.9% | 31.4% | — | — | 3.19 |
Home corners O/U 10
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chengdu Rongcheng over 2.5 corners | 94.8% | 89.4% | — | — | 1.12 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng over 3.5 corners | 88.6% | 86.3% | — | — | 1.16 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng over 4.5 corners | 79.7% | 76.6% | — | — | 1.31 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng over 5.5 corners | 68.9% | 66.7% | — | — | 1.50 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng over 6.5 corners | 57.1% | 57.5% | — | — | 1.74 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng under 6.5 corners | 42.9% | 42.5% | — | — | 2.35 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng under 5.5 corners | 31.1% | 33.3% | — | — | 3.00 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng under 4.5 corners | 20.3% | 23.4% | — | — | 4.27 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng under 3.5 corners | 11.4% | 13.7% | — | — | 7.28 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng under 2.5 corners | 5.2% | 10.6% | — | — | 9.39 |
Home goals O/U 8
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chengdu Rongcheng under 3.5 goals | 90.1% | 92.2% | 89.5% | 1.03× | 1.08 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng over 0.5 goals | 82.4% | 82.1% | 86.1% | 0.95× | 1.22 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng under 2.5 goals | 74.7% | 74.2% | 73.8% | 1.01× | 1.35 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng over 1.5 goals | 51.9% | 53.2% | 52.2% | 1.02× | 1.88 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng under 1.5 goals | 48.1% | 46.8% | 47.8% | 0.98× | 2.14 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng over 2.5 goals | 25.3% | 25.8% | 26.2% | 0.98× | 3.88 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng under 0.5 goals | 17.6% | 17.9% | 13.9% | 1.29× | 5.59 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng over 3.5 goals | 9.9% | 7.8% | 10.5% | 0.74× | 12.90 |
Home goals O/U 1HT 4
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chengdu Rongcheng under 1.5 in 1st half | 82.7% | 84.5% | — | — | 1.18 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng under 0.5 in 1st half | 47.3% | 50.6% | — | — | 1.98 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng over 0.5 in 1st half | 52.7% | 49.4% | — | — | 2.03 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng over 1.5 in 1st half | 17.3% | 15.5% | — | — | 6.45 |
Home no bet 2
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Draw (home no bet) | 54.6% | 51.6% | 48.3% | 1.07× | 1.94 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger (home no bet) | 45.4% | 48.4% | 51.7% | 0.94× | 2.07 |
Home Odd/Even 2
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chengdu Rongcheng even goals | 51.5% | 50.6% | 48.3% | 1.05× | 1.98 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng odd goals | 48.5% | 49.4% | 51.7% | 0.95× | 2.03 |
HT correct score 10
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HT 0-0 | 32.3% | 32.1% | — | — | 3.12 |
| HT 1-0 | 24.0% | 24.2% | — | — | 4.13 |
| HT 0-1 | 12.3% | 11.0% | — | — | 9.11 |
| HT 1-1 | 9.3% | 7.1% | — | — | 14.14 |
| HT 2-0 | 9.0% | 7.1% | — | — | 14.15 |
| Any other HT score | 4.7% | 2.3% | — | — | 43.72 |
| HT 2-1 | 3.5% | 2.3% | — | — | 43.81 |
| HT 0-2 | 2.4% | 2.3% | — | — | 43.89 |
| HT 1-2 | 1.8% | 2.3% | — | — | 43.94 |
| HT 2-2 | 0.7% | 2.3% | — | — | 44.02 |
HT/FT 9
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chengdu Rongcheng at HT / Chengdu Rongcheng at FT | 34.1% | 32.5% | — | — | 3.07 |
| Draw at HT / Chengdu Rongcheng at FT | 18.6% | 16.8% | — | — | 5.94 |
| Draw at HT / Draw at FT | 15.2% | 16.8% | — | — | 5.95 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger at HT / Tianjin Jinmen Tiger at FT | 10.3% | 12.6% | — | — | 7.91 |
| Draw at HT / Tianjin Jinmen Tiger at FT | 8.6% | 6.0% | — | — | 16.55 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng at HT / Draw at FT | 4.9% | 3.5% | — | — | 28.80 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger at HT / Draw at FT | 4.3% | 3.5% | — | — | 28.82 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger at HT / Chengdu Rongcheng at FT | 2.6% | 3.5% | — | — | 28.89 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng at HT / Tianjin Jinmen Tiger at FT | 1.5% | 3.5% | — | — | 28.93 |
Last goal 3
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chengdu Rongcheng to score last | 59.9% | 56.8% | — | — | 1.76 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger to score last | 33.0% | 33.2% | — | — | 3.02 |
| No goal scored | 7.1% | 7.5% | — | — | 13.36 |
Lead at any time 9
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Either team to lead by 1 at any time | 92.9% | 92.6% | — | — | 1.08 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng to lead by 1 at any time | 68.4% | 69.5% | — | — | 1.44 |
| Either team to lead by 2 at any time | 48.5% | 44.1% | — | — | 2.27 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger to lead by 1 at any time | 37.7% | 34.8% | — | — | 2.87 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng to lead by 2 at any time | 37.3% | 34.8% | — | — | 2.88 |
| Either team to lead by 3 at any time | 19.1% | 15.0% | — | — | 6.67 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng to lead by 3 at any time | 16.3% | 14.9% | — | — | 6.69 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger to lead by 2 at any time | 11.4% | 10.4% | — | — | 9.63 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger to lead by 3 at any time | 2.8% | 1.6% | — | — | 63.74 |
Most corners 3
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chengdu Rongcheng most corners | 83.9% | 81.8% | — | — | 1.22 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger most corners | 10.2% | 10.4% | — | — | 9.61 |
| Corners level | 6.0% | 8.5% | — | — | 11.82 |
Multi goal 15
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-5 goals | 87.2% | 87.4% | 84.7% | 1.03× | 1.14 |
| 1-4 goals | 79.2% | 78.6% | 74.7% | 1.05× | 1.27 |
| 2-6 goals | 73.5% | 72.4% | 77.9% | 0.93× | 1.38 |
| 2-5 goals | 69.9% | 69.0% | 70.8% | 0.97× | 1.45 |
| 1-3 goals | 64.3% | 63.4% | 55.1% | 1.15× | 1.58 |
| 2-4 goals | 61.8% | 63.4% | 60.8% | 1.04× | 1.58 |
| 3-6 goals | 48.6% | 48.7% | 56.0% | 0.87× | 2.06 |
| 2-3 goals | 46.9% | 48.7% | 41.2% | 1.18× | 2.06 |
| 3-5 goals | 45.0% | 48.7% | 49.0% | 0.99× | 2.06 |
| 1-2 goals | 42.2% | 43.6% | 36.0% | 1.21× | 2.30 |
| 3-4 goals | 37.0% | 39.2% | 39.0% | 1.01× | 2.55 |
| 4-6 goals | 26.6% | 30.2% | 36.9% | 0.82× | 3.31 |
| 4-5 goals | 22.9% | 24.5% | 29.8% | 0.82× | 4.09 |
| 5-6 goals | 11.7% | 14.9% | 17.3% | 0.86× | 6.73 |
| 7+ goals | 2.1% | 2.5% | 4.1% | 0.62× | 39.42 |
Never down 2
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chengdu Rongcheng never behind | 55.2% | 62.3% | — | — | 1.61 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger never behind | 24.5% | 24.5% | — | — | 4.09 |
Odd/Even 2
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Odd number of goals | 49.0% | 50.8% | 46.2% | 1.10× | 1.97 |
| Even number of goals | 51.0% | 49.2% | 53.8% | 0.91× | 2.03 |
Odd/Even 1HT 2
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Even goals in 1st half | 55.3% | 57.4% | — | — | 1.74 |
| Odd goals in 1st half | 44.7% | 42.6% | — | — | 2.35 |
Odd/Even 2HT 2
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Even goals in 2nd half | 52.4% | 52.1% | — | — | 1.92 |
| Odd goals in 2nd half | 47.6% | 47.9% | — | — | 2.09 |
Over/Under 12
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under 5.5 goals | 94.3% | 92.3% | 88.8% | 1.04× | 1.08 |
| Over 0.5 goals | 92.9% | 92.3% | 95.7% | 0.96× | 1.08 |
| Under 4.5 goals | 86.3% | 87.6% | 78.8% | 1.11× | 1.14 |
| Over 1.5 goals | 75.6% | 77.4% | 81.8% | 0.95× | 1.29 |
| Under 3.5 goals | 71.4% | 72.5% | 59.2% | 1.22× | 1.38 |
| Over 2.5 goals | 50.7% | 52.4% | 59.9% | 0.88× | 1.91 |
| Under 2.5 goals | 49.3% | 47.6% | 40.1% | 1.19× | 2.10 |
| Over 3.5 goals | 28.6% | 27.5% | 40.8% | 0.67× | 3.64 |
| Under 1.5 goals | 24.4% | 22.6% | 18.2% | 1.24× | 4.42 |
| Over 4.5 goals | 13.7% | 12.4% | 21.2% | 0.58× | 8.09 |
| Under 0.5 goals | 7.1% | 7.7% | 4.3% | 1.79× | 12.94 |
| Over 5.5 goals | 5.7% | 7.7% | 11.2% | 0.69× | 12.95 |
Over/Under (whole line) 10
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under 6 (void on exactly 6) | 97.9% | 97.2% | 95.6% | 1.02× | 1.03 |
| Under 5 (void on exactly 5) | 93.8% | 92.5% | 87.6% | 1.06× | 1.08 |
| Under 4 (void on exactly 4) | 83.9% | 81.1% | 73.7% | 1.10× | 1.23 |
| Over 2 (void on exactly 2) | 67.5% | 67.4% | 76.7% | 0.88× | 1.48 |
| Under 3 (void on exactly 3) | 63.3% | 62.1% | 49.6% | 1.25× | 1.61 |
| Over 3 (void on exactly 3) | 36.7% | 37.9% | 50.4% | 0.75× | 2.64 |
| Under 2 (void on exactly 2) | 32.5% | 32.6% | 23.3% | 1.40× | 3.07 |
| Over 4 (void on exactly 4) | 16.1% | 18.9% | 26.3% | 0.72× | 5.29 |
| Over 5 (void on exactly 5) | 6.2% | 7.5% | 12.4% | 0.61× | 13.28 |
| Over 6 (void on exactly 6) | 2.1% | 2.8% | 4.4% | 0.62× | 36.36 |
Over/Under 1HT 6
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under 2.5 in 1st half | 89.4% | 89.1% | — | — | 1.12 |
| Under 1.5 in 1st half | 68.6% | 69.2% | — | — | 1.45 |
| Over 0.5 in 1st half | 67.7% | 69.1% | — | — | 1.45 |
| Under 0.5 in 1st half | 32.3% | 30.9% | — | — | 3.24 |
| Over 1.5 in 1st half | 31.4% | 30.8% | — | — | 3.24 |
| Over 2.5 in 1st half | 10.6% | 10.9% | — | — | 9.20 |
Over/Under 2HT 6
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under 2.5 in 2nd half | 79.1% | 80.0% | — | — | 1.25 |
| Over 0.5 in 2nd half | 79.0% | 80.0% | — | — | 1.25 |
| Under 1.5 in 2nd half | 53.4% | 53.5% | — | — | 1.87 |
| Over 1.5 in 2nd half | 46.6% | 46.6% | — | — | 2.15 |
| Under 0.5 in 2nd half | 21.0% | 20.0% | — | — | 4.99 |
| Over 2.5 in 2nd half | 20.9% | 20.0% | — | — | 4.99 |
Score both halves 4
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger not to score in both halves | 86.0% | 85.9% | — | — | 1.16 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng not to score in both halves | 66.9% | 70.2% | — | — | 1.43 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng to score in both halves | 33.1% | 29.8% | — | — | 3.35 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger to score in both halves | 14.0% | 14.1% | — | — | 7.10 |
Teams to score 4
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Both teams score | 51.3% | 53.9% | 63.1% | 0.85× | 1.86 |
| Only Chengdu Rongcheng scores | 31.1% | 33.3% | 23.2% | 1.44× | 3.00 |
| Only Tianjin Jinmen Tiger scores | 10.4% | 10.9% | 9.8% | 1.12× | 9.15 |
| Neither team scores | 7.1% | 7.2% | 4.3% | 1.66× | 13.91 |
Total goals 7
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exactly 2 goals | 24.9% | 22.6% | 22.1% | 1.02× | 4.42 |
| Exactly 3 goals | 22.1% | 22.6% | 19.4% | 1.17× | 4.42 |
| Exactly 1 goals | 17.3% | 17.4% | 14.1% | 1.24× | 5.73 |
| Exactly 4 goals | 14.9% | 12.1% | 19.8% | 0.61× | 8.28 |
| Exactly 5 goals | 8.1% | 7.6% | 10.3% | 0.75× | 13.09 |
| Exactly 0 goals | 7.1% | 7.6% | 4.3% | 1.76× | 13.09 |
| 6 or more goals | 5.7% | 7.6% | 11.2% | 0.68× | 13.10 |
Total goals 2nd half 3
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2+ goals in 2nd half | 46.6% | 44.7% | — | — | 2.24 |
| 1 goal in 2nd half | 32.4% | 33.6% | — | — | 2.97 |
| No goals in 2nd half | 21.0% | 23.0% | — | — | 4.35 |
Win both halves 4
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger not to win both halves | 96.4% | 97.2% | — | — | 1.03 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng not to win both halves | 81.9% | 84.1% | — | — | 1.19 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng to win both halves | 18.1% | 15.9% | — | — | 6.28 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger to win both halves | 3.6% | 2.8% | — | — | 35.53 |
Win either half 4
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chengdu Rongcheng to win either half | 66.8% | 67.9% | — | — | 1.47 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger to win neither half | 65.7% | 67.8% | — | — | 1.48 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger to win either half | 34.3% | 32.2% | — | — | 3.10 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng to win neither half | 33.2% | 32.1% | — | — | 3.11 |
Win to nil 4
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger not to win to nil | 89.6% | 88.2% | 90.2% | 0.98× | 1.13 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng not to win to nil | 68.9% | 69.7% | 76.8% | 0.91× | 1.44 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng to win to nil | 31.1% | 30.3% | 23.2% | 1.31× | 3.30 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger to win to nil | 10.4% | 11.8% | 9.8% | 1.20× | 8.49 |
Winning margin 7
| Selection | Model | Calibrated | Base | Lift | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Draw | 24.4% | 24.2% | 26.2% | 0.92× | 4.14 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng by 1 | 24.2% | 24.2% | 21.0% | 1.15× | 4.14 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng by 2 | 17.1% | 17.0% | 14.8% | 1.14× | 5.90 |
| Chengdu Rongcheng by 3+ | 13.9% | 11.8% | 10.7% | 1.10× | 8.47 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger by 1 | 13.2% | 11.8% | 16.4% | 0.72× | 8.47 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger by 2 | 5.2% | 7.2% | 7.1% | 1.03× | 13.81 |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger by 3+ | 1.9% | 2.7% | 5.0% | 0.54× | 37.08 |