Viborg FF v AC Horsens — Prediction, Odds & Stats
Sunday 1 November 2026 · DEN-Superliga · 2627
DEN-Superliga
results-only Prediction generated
AI prediction
ai-blend v1.0 dailyRaw model output; no calibration record for this fixture's bands yet.
Top 5 scorelines
- 1-1 10.8%
- 2-1 9.9%
- 2-0 9.2%
- 1-0 8.7%
- 3-1 6.5%
Goals
| Over 2.5 | 58.5% | Under 2.5 | 41.5% |
| BTTS yes | 57.5% | BTTS no | 42.5% |
| Viborg FF 1+ | 85.8% | Viborg FF 2+ | 58.2% |
| AC Horsens 1+ | 66.2% | AC Horsens 2+ | 29.5% |
Expected goals 1.96 – 1.08. Every market above is read off one scoreline distribution.
Footing
Positive factors
- Viborg FF carry the stronger rating, 1584 Elo against 1481.
- Form is good: 2.00 points a match from the last five.
Risk factors
- Data quality is 45/100, so this price rests on less than the model would like.
- AC Horsens have only 5 matches on record.
Why the model thinks this
The price
Viborg FF have an estimated 57.0% win probability, against 23.1% for the draw and 20.0% for AC Horsens. Expected goals from the ensemble are 1.96 for Viborg FF and 1.08 for AC Horsens.
Why Viborg FF
Viborg FF carry the stronger rating, 1584 Elo against 1481. Form is good: 2.00 points a match from the last five.
Why the draw is live
The draw sits at 23.1%. Draws run at 25% in this competition.
Why AC Horsens can win
Nothing in the data singles out AC Horsens.
Key players
No player-level data for this fixture; the leagues with lineups are the big five.
Availability
No lineup on record for Viborg FF, so availability is unknown. No lineup on record for AC Horsens, so availability is unknown.
The matchup, as far as the data reaches
Viborg FF: 47% possession, 13.0 shots a match, 14.2 faced, 0.30 xG a match from set pieces. AC Horsens: 46% possession, 9.2 shots a match, 14.6 faced, 0.30 xG a match from set pieces.
Inputs last refreshed: matches 2026-09-05 22:20 · team_stats 2026-09-05 09:41 · availability 2026-09-05 21:03 · prediction 2026-09-05 18:39 ·
Viborg FF are the model's most likely outcome at 57.0%. The likeliest scoreline is 1-1 at 10.8%. Confidence 66/100, data quality 45/100. These are probabilities, not certainties: the less likely outcome happens as often as its number says.
Written from the numbers the model saw, not by a language model; nothing here is a statistic the snapshot does not hold. How predictions work.
Was this pick made in advance?
-oos is out of sample: it was fitted only on matches
played before this one, so its pick is a genuine forecast rather than hindsight.
Anything without that suffix was fitted on all available data.What the model said
| Model | Home / Draw / Away | Expected goals | Likeliest score | O2.5 | BTTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dc-xg | 2.19–1.26 | 2-1 10% | 67% | 64% |
A model whose name ends -oos was produced by the walk-forward backtest:
it was fitted only on matches played before this one, so the pick is genuinely out of sample.