betaider.com

Results

Most recent 60 matches, newest first

What xG diff tells you
xG is the quality of chances each side created. Compare it with the score: a team that won 2-0 while losing the xG 0.7 to 2.1 was outplayed and got the result anyway. Over a season, results drift back toward xG — which is why the model is fitted on expected goals rather than goals.
DateMatchScorexG xG diffModel pick Called
14 Jun 26 Vegas Golden Knights v Carolina Hurricanes 0–3 —–— called it analysis →
11 Jun 26 Carolina Hurricanes v Vegas Golden Knights 4–2 —–— called it analysis →
9 Jun 26 Vegas Golden Knights v Carolina Hurricanes 3–5 —–— called it analysis →
6 Jun 26 Vegas Golden Knights v Carolina Hurricanes 5–4 —–— missed analysis →
4 Jun 26 Carolina Hurricanes v Vegas Golden Knights 4–3 —–— called it analysis →
2 Jun 26 Carolina Hurricanes v Vegas Golden Knights 4–5 —–— missed analysis →
29 May 26 Carolina Hurricanes v Montreal Canadiens 6–1 —–— called it analysis →
27 May 26 Montreal Canadiens v Carolina Hurricanes 0–4 —–— called it analysis →
26 May 26 Vegas Golden Knights v Colorado Avalanche 2–1 —–— missed analysis →
25 May 26 Montreal Canadiens v Carolina Hurricanes 2–3 —–— called it analysis →
24 May 26 Vegas Golden Knights v Colorado Avalanche 5–3 —–— missed analysis →
23 May 26 Carolina Hurricanes v Montreal Canadiens 3–2 —–— called it analysis →
22 May 26 Colorado Avalanche v Vegas Golden Knights 1–3 —–— missed analysis →
21 May 26 Carolina Hurricanes v Montreal Canadiens 2–6 —–— missed analysis →
20 May 26 Colorado Avalanche v Vegas Golden Knights 2–4 —–— missed analysis →
18 May 26 Buffalo Sabres v Montreal Canadiens 2–3 —–— missed analysis →
16 May 26 Montreal Canadiens v Buffalo Sabres 3–8 —–— called it analysis →
14 May 26 Anaheim Ducks v Vegas Golden Knights 1–5 —–— called it analysis →
14 May 26 Buffalo Sabres v Montreal Canadiens 3–6 —–— missed analysis →
13 May 26 Colorado Avalanche v Minnesota Wild 4–3 —–— called it analysis →
12 May 26 Vegas Golden Knights v Anaheim Ducks 3–2 —–— called it analysis →
12 May 26 Montreal Canadiens v Buffalo Sabres 2–3 —–— called it analysis →
11 May 26 Minnesota Wild v Colorado Avalanche 2–5 —–— called it analysis →
10 May 26 Anaheim Ducks v Vegas Golden Knights 4–3 —–— missed analysis →
10 May 26 Montreal Canadiens v Buffalo Sabres 6–2 —–— missed analysis →
9 May 26 Minnesota Wild v Colorado Avalanche 5–1 —–— missed analysis →
9 May 26 Philadelphia Flyers v Carolina Hurricanes 2–3 —–— called it analysis →
8 May 26 Anaheim Ducks v Vegas Golden Knights 2–6 —–— called it analysis →
8 May 26 Buffalo Sabres v Montreal Canadiens 1–5 —–— missed analysis →
7 May 26 Philadelphia Flyers v Carolina Hurricanes 1–4 —–— called it analysis →
6 May 26 Vegas Golden Knights v Anaheim Ducks 1–3 —–— missed analysis →
6 May 26 Buffalo Sabres v Montreal Canadiens 4–2 —–— called it analysis →
5 May 26 Colorado Avalanche v Minnesota Wild 5–2 —–— called it analysis →
4 May 26 Vegas Golden Knights v Anaheim Ducks 3–1 —–— called it analysis →
4 May 26 Carolina Hurricanes v Philadelphia Flyers 3–2 —–— called it analysis →
3 May 26 Colorado Avalanche v Minnesota Wild 9–6 —–— called it analysis →
3 May 26 Tampa Bay Lightning v Montreal Canadiens 1–2 —–— missed analysis →
2 May 26 Carolina Hurricanes v Philadelphia Flyers 3–0 —–— called it analysis →
1 May 26 Utah Mammoth v Vegas Golden Knights 1–5 —–— missed analysis →
1 May 26 Boston Bruins v Buffalo Sabres 1–4 —–— called it analysis →
1 May 26 Montreal Canadiens v Tampa Bay Lightning 0–1 —–— called it analysis →
30 Apr 26 Anaheim Ducks v Edmonton Oilers 5–2 —–— missed analysis →
30 Apr 26 Minnesota Wild v Dallas Stars 5–2 —–— missed analysis →
29 Apr 26 Vegas Golden Knights v Utah Mammoth 5–4 —–— called it analysis →
29 Apr 26 Philadelphia Flyers v Pittsburgh Penguins 1–0 —–— missed analysis →
29 Apr 26 Tampa Bay Lightning v Montreal Canadiens 2–3 —–— missed analysis →
28 Apr 26 Edmonton Oilers v Anaheim Ducks 4–1 —–— called it analysis →
28 Apr 26 Dallas Stars v Minnesota Wild 2–4 —–— missed analysis →
28 Apr 26 Buffalo Sabres v Boston Bruins 1–2 —–— missed analysis →
27 Apr 26 Utah Mammoth v Vegas Golden Knights 4–5 —–— missed analysis →
27 Apr 26 Pittsburgh Penguins v Philadelphia Flyers 3–2 —–— called it analysis →
26 Apr 26 Anaheim Ducks v Edmonton Oilers 4–3 —–— missed analysis →
26 Apr 26 Montreal Canadiens v Tampa Bay Lightning 2–3 —–— called it analysis →
26 Apr 26 Los Angeles Kings v Colorado Avalanche 1–5 —–— called it analysis →
26 Apr 26 Boston Bruins v Buffalo Sabres 1–6 —–— called it analysis →
25 Apr 26 Philadelphia Flyers v Pittsburgh Penguins 2–4 —–— called it analysis →
25 Apr 26 Minnesota Wild v Dallas Stars 3–2 —–— missed analysis →
25 Apr 26 Ottawa Senators v Carolina Hurricanes 2–4 —–— missed analysis →
24 Apr 26 Anaheim Ducks v Edmonton Oilers 6–4 —–— missed analysis →
24 Apr 26 Utah Mammoth v Vegas Golden Knights 4–2 —–— called it analysis →

33 of 60 most-likely calls landed — 55%. Always backing the home side over the same matches would have called 47%, so the model is +8 points ahead of that.

Picking the most likely of three outcomes is a coarse test: it ignores how confident the model was, and a model can be right more often while forecasting worse. The measured versions are on Model, Calibration and Receipts.

The model pick is the out-of-sample forecast: made by a model fitted only on matches played before that one, so it is what the model actually said in advance. A dash means no forecast was on record before kick-off.

betaider.com

Sport

Ice hockey sections

Preferences

Appearance
Aider Reading the Ice hockey model · online
Open the Radar
Bet slip
Open full page
to move to open esc to close See all results

On this page

Results

What this page is for

What actually happened, most recent first. It is the quickest way to confirm a result has been ingested — a match that has finished in real life but is missing here has not reached the database yet, and anything downstream of it (ratings, form, settled picks) is still working from the older picture.

How to read it

Each row is a completed match with its final score. Open one to reach its Match page, where the model's pre-match view sits beside the result it was trying to predict.

Where to go next

For whether the predictions were any good in aggregate rather than one at a time, use Track record.

Press esc to close Read the full guide