betaider.com
Sign in

Results

Most recent 60 matches, newest first

What xG diff tells you
xG is the quality of chances each side created. Compare it with the score: a team that won 2-0 while losing the xG 0.7 to 2.1 was outplayed and got the result anyway. Over a season, results drift back toward xG — which is why the model is fitted on expected goals rather than goals.
DateMatchScorexG xG diffModel pick Called
30 Aug 26 Dallas Wings v Connecticut Sun 97–71 —–— — called it analysis →
30 Aug 26 Portland Fire v Golden State Valkyries 69–86 —–— — called it analysis →
30 Aug 26 Seattle Storm v Los Angeles Sparks 74–90 —–— — missed analysis →
30 Aug 26 Atlanta Dream v Minnesota Lynx 89–81 —–— — called it analysis →
29 Aug 26 Phoenix Mercury v Toronto Tempo 101–69 —–— — called it analysis →
29 Aug 26 New York Liberty v Chicago Sky 85–66 —–— — called it analysis →
28 Aug 26 Los Angeles Sparks v Washington Mystics 88–82 —–— — missed analysis →
28 Aug 26 Las Vegas Aces v Toronto Tempo 93–73 —–— — called it analysis →
28 Aug 26 Indiana Fever v Connecticut Sun 111–91 —–— — called it analysis →
28 Aug 26 Atlanta Dream v Portland Fire 83–101 —–— — missed analysis →
27 Aug 26 Phoenix Mercury v Washington Mystics 73–80 —–— — called it analysis →
27 Aug 26 New York Liberty v Golden State Valkyries 60–79 —–— — called it analysis →
26 Aug 26 Seattle Storm v Toronto Tempo 90–78 —–— — called it analysis →
26 Aug 26 Connecticut Sun v Golden State Valkyries 64–89 —–— — called it analysis →
25 Aug 26 Phoenix Mercury v Washington Mystics 84–94 —–— — called it analysis →
25 Aug 26 Dallas Wings v Portland Fire 96–78 —–— — called it analysis →
25 Aug 26 Connecticut Sun v Chicago Sky 87–81 —–— — missed analysis →
24 Aug 26 Los Angeles Sparks v Atlanta Dream 71–78 —–— — called it analysis →
24 Aug 26 Minnesota Lynx v Golden State Valkyries 66–80 —–— — missed analysis →
23 Aug 26 Toronto Tempo v Las Vegas Aces 78–88 —–— — called it analysis →
23 Aug 26 Portland Fire v Washington Mystics 100–105 —–— — called it analysis →
23 Aug 26 Chicago Sky v Indiana Fever 90–113 —–— — called it analysis →
23 Aug 26 Dallas Wings v Seattle Storm 92–70 —–— — called it analysis →
22 Aug 26 Phoenix Mercury v Atlanta Dream 89–99 —–— — called it analysis →
22 Aug 26 Los Angeles Sparks v Connecticut Sun 77–68 —–— — called it analysis →
22 Aug 26 New York Liberty v Indiana Fever 109–102 —–— — missed analysis →
21 Aug 26 Toronto Tempo v Portland Fire 82–79 —–— — missed analysis →
21 Aug 26 Chicago Sky v Golden State Valkyries 73–70 —–— — missed analysis →
21 Aug 26 Washington Mystics v Minnesota Lynx 84–94 —–— — called it analysis →
20 Aug 26 Los Angeles Sparks v Atlanta Dream 88–124 —–— — called it analysis →
20 Aug 26 Las Vegas Aces v Connecticut Sun 101–78 —–— — called it analysis →
20 Aug 26 Dallas Wings v Indiana Fever 91–85 —–— — missed analysis →
19 Aug 26 Golden State Valkyries v Minnesota Lynx 66–77 —–— — missed analysis →
19 Aug 26 Washington Mystics v Toronto Tempo 93–82 —–— — called it analysis →
18 Aug 26 Las Vegas Aces v Atlanta Dream 82–97 —–— — missed analysis →
18 Aug 26 Chicago Sky v New York Liberty 93–86 —–— — missed analysis →
18 Aug 26 Toronto Tempo v Indiana Fever 95–101 —–— — called it analysis →
18 Aug 26 Connecticut Sun v Los Angeles Sparks 85–77 —–— — missed analysis →
17 Aug 26 Golden State Valkyries v Dallas Wings 78–70 —–— — called it analysis →
16 Aug 26 Phoenix Mercury v Portland Fire 85–88 —–— — missed analysis →
16 Aug 26 Atlanta Dream v Indiana Fever 91–95 —–— — called it analysis →
16 Aug 26 Seattle Storm v Chicago Sky 80–82 —–— — missed analysis →
15 Aug 26 Las Vegas Aces v Minnesota Lynx 87–92 —–— — called it analysis →
15 Aug 26 Washington Mystics v Los Angeles Sparks 80–70 —–— — called it analysis →
15 Aug 26 Connecticut Sun v New York Liberty 75–82 —–— — called it analysis →
14 Aug 26 Seattle Storm v Portland Fire 82–84 —–— — missed analysis →
14 Aug 26 Indiana Fever v Dallas Wings 98–87 —–— — called it analysis →
13 Aug 26 Las Vegas Aces v Washington Mystics 83–76 —–— — called it analysis →
13 Aug 26 New York Liberty v Los Angeles Sparks 85–81 —–— — called it analysis →
13 Aug 26 Connecticut Sun v Atlanta Dream 69–104 —–— — called it analysis →
12 Aug 26 Portland Fire v Minnesota Lynx 81–85 —–— — called it analysis →
12 Aug 26 Golden State Valkyries v Chicago Sky 91–71 —–— — called it analysis →
12 Aug 26 Dallas Wings v Toronto Tempo 94–88 —–— — called it analysis →
11 Aug 26 Los Angeles Sparks v Phoenix Mercury 87–94 —–— — called it analysis →
11 Aug 26 Las Vegas Aces v Washington Mystics 86–76 —–— — called it analysis →
11 Aug 26 Indiana Fever v New York Liberty 106–92 —–— — called it analysis →
10 Aug 26 Seattle Storm v Chicago Sky 97–88 —–— — called it analysis →
10 Aug 26 Atlanta Dream v Toronto Tempo 107–95 —–— — called it analysis →
9 Aug 26 Los Angeles Sparks v Golden State Valkyries 78–84 —–— — called it analysis →
9 Aug 26 Minnesota Lynx v Dallas Wings 103–90 —–— — called it analysis →

44 of 60 most-likely calls landed — 73%. Always backing the home side over the same matches would have called 53%, so the model is +20 points ahead of that.

Picking the most likely of three outcomes is a coarse test: it ignores how confident the model was, and a model can be right more often while forecasting worse. The measured versions are on Model, Calibration and Receipts.

The model pick is the out-of-sample forecast: made by a model fitted only on matches played before that one, so it is what the model actually said in advance. A dash means no forecast was on record before kick-off.

betaider.com

Sport

Basketball sections

Preferences

Appearance
Aider Reading the Basketball model · online
Open the Radar
Bet slip
Open full page
↑↓ to move ↵ to open esc to close See all results

On this page

Results

What this page is for

What actually happened, most recent first. It is the quickest way to confirm a result has been ingested — a match that has finished in real life but is missing here has not reached the database yet, and anything downstream of it (ratings, form, settled picks) is still working from the older picture.

How to read it

Each row is a completed match with its final score. Open one to reach its Match page, where the model's pre-match view sits beside the result it was trying to predict.

Where to go next

For whether the predictions were any good in aggregate rather than one at a time, use Track record.

Press esc to close Read the full guide